Answers in Genesis, one of the premier Creationist sites, also dabbles fairly well in other related world view issues. And they keep tempting me to subscribe to their journal by publishing articles from past issues.
The most recent is Athena and Eve, a nice discussion of the parallels between Greek mythology and the Genesis stories. After a very lengthy and informative article, the author concludes
Modern scholarship has yet to learn the simple lesson that, without reference to the early events described in the book of Genesis, it is not possible to make any real sense of Greek mythology. In fact, the entire formidable religious framework of ancient Greek society means virtually nothing without reference to those events. The next time you’re in a bookstore or a library, go to the mythology section. Look at all the books on the subject and ponder all the fruitless theorizing and all the wasted paper that have resulted from writers leaving the Creator of Heaven and Earth out of what they imagine is their deep and reasonable thinking.
One serious conceptual problem with the article is its uncritical use of the Modern/Christian concept of univocality. Everything has one, and only one, meaning, no matter the heterogeneity of the subject or the arbitrariness of the genus under which heterogeneous objects are grouped. Or, more simply, the Greeks thought lots of different things. The Hellenistic world was vast, both in time and in space, and comprised gazillions of different cultures.
Following the above, then, one of the first statements is silly: "Greek religion was thus a sophisticated form of ancestor worship." The rest of the argument follows the author's naive assumptions (naive in the sense that he doesn't even seem to have questioned his own assumptions).
The lesson isn't that Greek mythology can only be understood by reference to Christian mythology (a truly weird conceit); but that if you try hard enough to cram the former into the latter, you can probably get a few-thousand-word article out of your endeavor.
I think his most interesting assertion is that the Greek system is essentially befriending Satan (the serpent), thereby showing it's "true" origins. It reminds me of the Apostle Paul's statement about the false religions of his time, steeped in this same mythology (though Roman) – "the offerings they make are not unto God, but unto demons."