One of the recent issues of Science Magazine touts "Evolution in Action" as its breakthrough of the year. However, as Casey Luskin at the Center for Science and Culture points out, the evidence that Science puts forth should really be named Microevolution in Action. He...
The Discovery Institute has a nice post today entitled Intelligent Design is Empirically Testable and Makes Predictions. Go read it – here’s the intro… Among the many, many errors in Judge John Jones’ Dover vs. Kitzmiller opinion is the charge that intelligent design (ID) makes...
One of the many canards used by evolutionists against creationism and ID is that they are not testable. And while the creation event is as untestable as macroevolution, the creationist model does present predictions that are testable. Here are a few: Life appeared early in...
One of my favorite podcasts is from slate.com. While most of the Intelligent Design pieces are anti-ID and anti-creationism, the radio piece Evolution and Religion: Quit pretending they’re compatible is very interesting. The author discusses how evolution does contradict faith, and we see this in...
Pat Buchanan has written a fantastic article entitled Tom Bethell Puts Darwinism on Defense. Of course, he is referring to Bethel’s book The Politically Incorrect Guide to Science, which among other things, slams Darwinism as a theory of origins. Buchanan’s article is well said and...
Nancy Pearcey, author of Total Truth: Liberating Christianity from Its Cultural Captivity, weighs in on the debate over Intelligent Design with an excellent article in Human Events entitled "Why Intelligent Design Will Win". Read the whole thing. [Sorry, I wanted to add a little to...
Scott Adams, creator of Dilbert, is again poking a stick at the guard dogs of evolution in Intelligent Design Part 3. But he is right on target, asking the simple questions – if there is a phenomenon that science can not explain, which may have...
Answers in Genesis has a nice post today called Evolution and Medicine. The author makes some very nice points, though the article is too superficial and doesn’t address the many contentions that might arise in such a discussion, in particular, Ed (one of our commenters)...
