TTAM has a nice list with explanations of the Ten Major Flaws of Evolution. I’ve listed them here without the explanations, for reference and enjoyment. I know that these have all been "refuted" by evolutionists, but creationists, including myself, find their refutations unconvincing – and not because of our "faith", but because the evolutionary comebacks are weak. Fact is, evolution is bad science, and bad philosophy, nothing more.
- The complexity of living systems could never evolve by chance—they had to be designed and created.
- The high information content of DNA could only have come from intelligence.
- No mutation that increases genetic information has ever been discovered.
- Evolution flies directly in the face of entropy, the second law of thermodynamics.
- There is a total lack of undisputed examples (fossilized or living) of the millions of transitional forms ("missing links") required for evolution to be true.
- Pictures of ape-to-human "missing links" are extremely subjective and based on evolutionists’ already-formed assumptions. Often they are simply contrived.
- The dating methods that evolutionists rely upon to assign millions and billions of years to rocks are very inconsistent and based on unproven (and questionable) assumptions.
- Uses continue to be found for supposedly "leftover" [vestigial] body structures.
- Evolution is said to have begun by spontaneous generation—a concept ridiculed by biology.
- The scientific method can only test existing data—it cannot draw conclusions about origins.
