<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Former Atheists: A. N. Wilson</title> <atom:link href="http://www.wholereason.com/2009/05/former-atheists-a-n-wilson.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.wholereason.com/2009/05/former-atheists-a-n-wilson.html</link> <description>Fides Quaerens Intellectum  &#124;  Faith Seeking Understanding</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 21:24:53 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Robin Lionheart</title><link>http://www.wholereason.com/2009/05/former-atheists-a-n-wilson.html#comment-6254</link> <dc:creator>Robin Lionheart</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 12:23:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.wholereason.com/2009/05/former-atheists-a-n-wilson.html#comment-6254</guid> <description>Also, if you actually regard Gandhi as an incomparable genius and your intellectual superior, then why don&#039;t you become a Hindu? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, if you actually regard Gandhi as an incomparable genius and your intellectual superior, then why don&#039;t you become a Hindu?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Robin Lionheart</title><link>http://www.wholereason.com/2009/05/former-atheists-a-n-wilson.html#comment-6253</link> <dc:creator>Robin Lionheart</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:20:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.wholereason.com/2009/05/former-atheists-a-n-wilson.html#comment-6253</guid> <description>&lt;i&gt;And why stop at Ghandi, Bach and Beethoven? ... Newton, Shakespeare, Michelangelo, it&#039;s endless. Do atheists actually regard these incomparable geniuses as their intellectual inferiors?&lt;/i&gt;
Argument from the authority of playwrights and artists?
Isaac Newton was also one of the last alchemists, and sought to produce the philosopher&#039;s stone (a material that could transform lead into gold). He also looked for a Bible Code, and thought himself chosen by God for the task of understanding Biblical scripture. Newton was wrong about many things.
A modern high school student is more knowledgeable than Isaac Newton about the universe, thanks in part to the work of Newton centuries ago.
Michaelangelo is certainly a greater sculptor than I. But why should I regard him as a great intellectual? Can you name one of Michelangelo&#039;s great ideas? Bach&#039;s? Beethoven&#039;s? Shakespeare wrote great plays and poems, but what would make him an authority on metaphysics? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And why stop at Ghandi, Bach and Beethoven? &#8230; Newton, Shakespeare, Michelangelo, it&#039;s endless. Do atheists actually regard these incomparable geniuses as their intellectual inferiors?</i><br
/> Argument from the authority of playwrights and artists?<br
/> Isaac Newton was also one of the last alchemists, and sought to produce the philosopher&#039;s stone (a material that could transform lead into gold). He also looked for a Bible Code, and thought himself chosen by God for the task of understanding Biblical scripture. Newton was wrong about many things.<br
/> A modern high school student is more knowledgeable than Isaac Newton about the universe, thanks in part to the work of Newton centuries ago.<br
/> Michaelangelo is certainly a greater sculptor than I. But why should I regard him as a great intellectual? Can you name one of Michelangelo&#039;s great ideas? Bach&#039;s? Beethoven&#039;s? Shakespeare wrote great plays and poems, but what would make him an authority on metaphysics?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Robin Lionheart</title><link>http://www.wholereason.com/2009/05/former-atheists-a-n-wilson.html#comment-6252</link> <dc:creator>Robin Lionheart</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 04:59:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.wholereason.com/2009/05/former-atheists-a-n-wilson.html#comment-6252</guid> <description> </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Zack R</title><link>http://www.wholereason.com/2009/05/former-atheists-a-n-wilson.html#comment-6251</link> <dc:creator>Zack R</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 06:06:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.wholereason.com/2009/05/former-atheists-a-n-wilson.html#comment-6251</guid> <description>Always great to read of the coming to enlightenment (or re-enlightenment) of men like A. N. Wilson, so formerly hallowed by atheists and their like.  And why stop at Ghandi, Bach and Beethoven?  Nearly ALL great men were believers; the exceptions are relatively scarce.  Newton, Shakespeare, Michelangelo, it&#039;s endless.  Do atheists actually regard these incomparable geniuses as their intellectual inferiors?  Really, it is laughable.  Nor is the time factor relevant.  Shakespeare&#039;s plays (to cite but one example) remain timeless, matchless, up to and beyond the 21st century: his mind, though of the Elizabethan Age, cannot be seen as antique or quaint-- likewise his faith and that of all the other giants of human history who maintained a belief in God. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Always great to read of the coming to enlightenment (or re-enlightenment) of men like A. N. Wilson, so formerly hallowed by atheists and their like.  And why stop at Ghandi, Bach and Beethoven?  Nearly ALL great men were believers; the exceptions are relatively scarce.  Newton, Shakespeare, Michelangelo, it&#039;s endless.  Do atheists actually regard these incomparable geniuses as their intellectual inferiors?  Really, it is laughable.  Nor is the time factor relevant.  Shakespeare&#039;s plays (to cite but one example) remain timeless, matchless, up to and beyond the 21st century: his mind, though of the Elizabethan Age, cannot be seen as antique or quaint&#8211; likewise his faith and that of all the other giants of human history who maintained a belief in God.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
