Whole Reason

A mul­ti­me­dia art show in the Nether­lands is anger­ing Mus­lims because it includes pic­tures of sev­eral gay (and I don’t mean ‘happy’) Iran­ian men pos­ing with masks of Mohamed and his son-in-law Ali.  As reported by the new site Islamist­Watch:

Also included is a video pro­duc­tion titled “Allah ho gay­bar,” which
goes so far as to depict Mohammed as a homo­sex­ual. (The film, since
posted to the web, was cen­sored by YouTube.)

But what’s really inter­est­ing is not that these pic­tures offend Islam­opaths (no sur­prise there), but that it reveals (1) the preva­lence of homo­sex­u­al­ity within the repres­sive Islamic soci­ety, and (2) the fail­ure of mul­ti­cul­tur­al­ism in Holland.

1. Homo­sex­u­al­ity in Mus­lim countries

I have long sus­pected, but not had time to research, this hypoth­e­sis — in coun­tries and reli­gious com­mu­ni­ties (Islam, the Catholic priest­hood, some fun­da­men­tal­ist churches) that sup­press nor­mal human sex­u­al­ity, aber­rant sex­u­al­ity like rape, homo­sex­u­al­ity and pedophilia increase. 

Note, by sup­press, I don’t mean ask­ing con­gre­gants to use self-control, and abstain from promis­cu­ous sex — I mean com­mu­ni­ties that frown upon even healthy, het­ero, mar­ried sex, prac­tice a myopic focus on ‘holi­ness,’ or for­bid sex alto­gether for church lead­ers (like the unbib­li­cal celibacy rule for Catholic priests).

I have sus­pected that Imams and other pow­er­ful Mus­lims, while out­wardly con­demn­ing sex­ual immoral­ity, are secretly engaged in such things as homo­sex­u­al­ity and man/boy sex because they lack a healthy sex­ual rela­tion­ship with and per­spec­tive towards women, and that such alter­nate out­lets for sex­ual desire are prob­a­bly ignored know­ingly through­out the cul­ture.  The artist whose work is being vil­i­fied seems to con­firm my sus­pi­cions about Islamic coun­tries (and we already know what hap­pens when you force Catholic priests to be celibate):

34-year-old Sooreh Hera (warn­ing:
web­site includes some graphic con­tent) was born in Teheran, and seeks,
through her art, and in her own words, to denounce “hypocrisy with
regard to sex­u­al­ity in the Mus­lim world.” She claims that male

Iran and Saudi Ara­bia, especially.

2. The fail­ure of undis­cern­ing tolerance

As many have recently said, Europe is cav­ing in to Islam due to a patho­logic and undis­cern­ing mul­ti­cul­tur­al­ism.  Note what the artist says about Holland’s mul­ti­cul­tur­al­ism:

Sooreh came to Hol­land seven years ago, one imag­ines to pur­sue her art
and pas­sion freely, and to exploit the nation’s famous tol­er­ance. She describes her dis­ap­point­ment in words that echo Pim Fortuyn’s claim
that the Dutch had invited a “Tro­jan horse of intol­er­ance” into their
soci­ety in the name of mul­ti­cul­tur­al­ism: “I thought I would find
free­dom of expres­sion in the Nether­lands,” she com­plains. “But this is
not a free state. It’s become an Islamist dic­ta­tor­ship.” She says, finally: “Allah is great in the Nether­lands, and it’s fear that reigns.”

This is why we, con­ser­v­a­tive Amer­i­cans (and sur­pris­ingly, gay advo­cates, what strange ‘bed­fel­lows’) must be vig­i­lant in resist­ing Islam­i­fi­ca­tion of the US.  We may truly be the last hope of the west, which in Europe has suc­cumbed to the decep­tions of Islam via patho­logic ‘tolerance.’ 

I for one am glad that, even though I find homo­sex­u­al­ity unsa­vory and unhealthy, gay art is offend­ing Islam­o­fas­cists.  Not because I like such offenses, but because free­dom of speech should not be cowed into sub­mis­sion by threats, even if we don’t like what is being said. 

As long as con­fused lib­er­als and gay advo­cates con­fuse the Chris­t­ian oppo­si­tion to homo­sex­u­al­ity with the Islamic type, they will be let­ting Islamic vio­lence slip into our cul­ture.  Chris­tian­ity may not ‘tol­er­ate’ the gay agenda, but we value human rights, and do not bow to lethal threats in any sense, and you would be hard-pressed to find such threats among even fringe Chris­tians.  Islam makes no such promises.  It rules by fear, intim­i­da­tion, and murder.

John 8:39–47
“Abra­ham is our father,” they answered.   

“If you were Abraham’s chil­dren,” said Jesus, “then you would do the things Abra­ham did. As
it is, you are deter­mined to kill me, a man who has told you the truth
that I heard from God. Abra­ham did not do such things. You are doing the things your own father does.”

Jesus said to them, “If God were your Father, you would love me, for I
came from God and now am here. I have not come on my own; but he sent
me. Why is my lan­guage not clear to you? Because you are unable to hear what I say. You
belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your
father’s desire. He was a mur­derer from the begin­ning, not hold­ing to
the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his
native lan­guage, for he is a liar and the father of lies. Yet because I tell the truth, you do not believe me!

Can any of you prove me guilty of sin? If I am telling the truth, why don’t you believe me? He who belongs to God hears what God says. The rea­son you do not hear is that you do not belong to God.”

Related Posts:

• A Euro­pean Dec­la­ra­tion of Inde­pen­dence — Part I
• A Euro­pean Dec­la­ra­tion of Inde­pen­dence — Part II
• Den­mark con­tin­ues hard line on Islamic extremism
• Fitzger­ald:  It can, WILL hap­pen here
• Behead­ing Nations — The Islamiza­tion of Europe’s Cities