The much touted research that produced the ‘consensus’ mantra of global warming adherents has been updated with somewhat surprising results.

In fact of all papers published in this period (2004 to February 2007), only a single one makes any reference to climate change leading to catastrophic results.

Via Hot Air, who also notes that China is using the ol’ carbon footprint argument in defense of their human rights violations. The more babies they kill, the lower their pollution goes.

Of 528 total papers on climate change, only 38 (7%) gave an explicit endorsement of the consensus. If one considers “implicit” endorsement (accepting the consensus without explicit statement), the figure rises to 45%. However, while only 32 papers (6%) reject the consensus outright, the largest category  (48%) are neutral papers, refusing to either accept or reject the hypothesis.  This is no “consensus.”

The figures are even more shocking when one remembers the watered-down definition of  consensus here.  Not only does it not require supporting that man is the “primary” cause of warming, but it doesn’t require any belief or support for “catastrophic” global warming.  In fact of all papers published in this period (2004 to February 2007), only a single one makes any reference to climate change leading to catastrophic results.