<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The Ethics of Controversy &#8211; What TO Do</title> <atom:link href="http://www.wholereason.com/2007/06/the-ethics-of-controversy-what-to-do.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.wholereason.com/2007/06/the-ethics-of-controversy-what-to-do.html</link> <description>Fides Quaerens Intellectum  &#124;  Faith Seeking Understanding</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 21:24:53 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Cineaste</title><link>http://www.wholereason.com/2007/06/the-ethics-of-controversy-what-to-do.html#comment-12870</link> <dc:creator>Cineaste</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 22:32:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.wholereason.com/2007/06/the-ethics-of-controversy-what-to-do.html#comment-12870</guid> <description>What&#039;s the deal with your Sandy persona, Seeker? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#039;s the deal with your Sandy persona, Seeker?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: danielg</title><link>http://www.wholereason.com/2007/06/the-ethics-of-controversy-what-to-do.html#comment-12869</link> <dc:creator>danielg</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 22:10:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.wholereason.com/2007/06/the-ethics-of-controversy-what-to-do.html#comment-12869</guid> <description>And Sandy, anyone who uses the word puerile to describe the rantings of some of our more pitiful commenters is just trying to win me over.  And doing a good job.  :D </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Sandy, anyone who uses the word puerile to describe the rantings of some of our more pitiful commenters is just trying to win me over.  And doing a good job.  :D</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: danielg</title><link>http://www.wholereason.com/2007/06/the-ethics-of-controversy-what-to-do.html#comment-12868</link> <dc:creator>danielg</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 22:08:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.wholereason.com/2007/06/the-ethics-of-controversy-what-to-do.html#comment-12868</guid> <description>Sandy,
Thanks for the encouragement.  I rarely delete comments, but some are so insulting and juvenile that I just nuke them.
Hello Cin. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandy,<br
/> Thanks for the encouragement.  I rarely delete comments, but some are so insulting and juvenile that I just nuke them.<br
/> Hello Cin.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Cineaste</title><link>http://www.wholereason.com/2007/06/the-ethics-of-controversy-what-to-do.html#comment-12867</link> <dc:creator>Cineaste</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 21:57:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.wholereason.com/2007/06/the-ethics-of-controversy-what-to-do.html#comment-12867</guid> <description>Hello, Seeker. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, Seeker.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sandy</title><link>http://www.wholereason.com/2007/06/the-ethics-of-controversy-what-to-do.html#comment-12866</link> <dc:creator>Sandy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 21:53:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.wholereason.com/2007/06/the-ethics-of-controversy-what-to-do.html#comment-12866</guid> <description>Actually, Sandy is Sandy.  And I wouldn&#039;t call removing pornographic language from a public forum censorship.  This is an arena (I thought) discussion  and ideas, and that sort of puerile behaviour contributes nothing to meaningful debate. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Sandy is Sandy.  And I wouldn&#039;t call removing pornographic language from a public forum censorship.  This is an arena (I thought) discussion  and ideas, and that sort of puerile behaviour contributes nothing to meaningful debate.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Cineaste</title><link>http://www.wholereason.com/2007/06/the-ethics-of-controversy-what-to-do.html#comment-12865</link> <dc:creator>Cineaste</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:45:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.wholereason.com/2007/06/the-ethics-of-controversy-what-to-do.html#comment-12865</guid> <description>Just to let everyone know, &quot;Sandy&quot; is actually &quot;Seeker&quot;  giving himself praise and self justification for censorship. Pitiful. Seeker, do you need another hug? Just watch the free hugs video again. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to let everyone know, &quot;Sandy&quot; is actually &quot;Seeker&quot;  giving himself praise and self justification for censorship. Pitiful. Seeker, do you need another hug? Just watch the free hugs video again.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sandy</title><link>http://www.wholereason.com/2007/06/the-ethics-of-controversy-what-to-do.html#comment-12864</link> <dc:creator>Sandy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:01:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.wholereason.com/2007/06/the-ethics-of-controversy-what-to-do.html#comment-12864</guid> <description>I noticed, with mixed feelings of regret and relief, that you have edited/removed a vulgar and vile comment that was posted last night.  I don&#039;t know how many others saw it.  I was glad to see it gone, as it&#039;s content was certainly repugnant.  However, it would be nice for others to see the level of depravity and desperation of your critics.  Their inability to engage in reasonable and rational dialogue leaves them with little choice to engage in such personaly attacks, reminiscent of the kind of playground potty language I witnessed when I taught seventh grade.  It certainly demonstrates their complete lack of class.  If you were to post a similarly themed attack on any one else, the onslought of negitive criticism and attacks would be unparalleled. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed, with mixed feelings of regret and relief, that you have edited/removed a vulgar and vile comment that was posted last night.  I don&#039;t know how many others saw it.  I was glad to see it gone, as it&#039;s content was certainly repugnant.  However, it would be nice for others to see the level of depravity and desperation of your critics.  Their inability to engage in reasonable and rational dialogue leaves them with little choice to engage in such personaly attacks, reminiscent of the kind of playground potty language I witnessed when I taught seventh grade.  It certainly demonstrates their complete lack of class.  If you were to post a similarly themed attack on any one else, the onslought of negitive criticism and attacks would be unparalleled.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: SeekerWatch</title><link>http://www.wholereason.com/2007/06/the-ethics-of-controversy-what-to-do.html#comment-12863</link> <dc:creator>SeekerWatch</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 20:23:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.wholereason.com/2007/06/the-ethics-of-controversy-what-to-do.html#comment-12863</guid> <description>I don&#039;t like you, but even I have to admit somewhere inside you is a deeply wounded human being. you could not hate so much unless someone, somewhere once truly hated you and did not treat you right (unless you&#039;re a sociopath which I doubt).
don&#039;t get me wrong, I still think you&#039;re repulsive . having said that, maybe you do deserve some pity. aren&#039;t we all sinners after all?
may you find some peace. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t like you, but even I have to admit somewhere inside you is a deeply wounded human being. you could not hate so much unless someone, somewhere once truly hated you and did not treat you right (unless you&#039;re a sociopath which I doubt).<br
/> don&#039;t get me wrong, I still think you&#039;re repulsive . having said that, maybe you do deserve some pity. aren&#039;t we all sinners after all?<br
/> may you find some peace.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: SeekerWatch</title><link>http://www.wholereason.com/2007/06/the-ethics-of-controversy-what-to-do.html#comment-12862</link> <dc:creator>SeekerWatch</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 19:59:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.wholereason.com/2007/06/the-ethics-of-controversy-what-to-do.html#comment-12862</guid> <description>coming from an attention-seeking old queen like you who always wants to mix it up, that&#039;s a hoot. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>coming from an attention-seeking old queen like you who always wants to mix it up, that&#039;s a hoot.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
